Ok. That’s not what they call it. But that is essentially what it is.
Apple patented technology that allows venue owners to use an infrared device that would interact with the iPhone camera and stop people from recording or taking photos.
It’s easy to see who would want this. Adele, that’s who. She seems like she would be the first in line to stop people from bootlegging her concerts.
Instead of using the DMCA to police YouTube, Vimeo, and such sites after the fact, this would enable Adele to belt out “Hello” and block it from being recorded at the outset.
With the rise of live streaming apps like Periscope, you could see how a copyright owner would want this even more. These apps make it possible for someone – anyone – to livestream a concert to thousands who didn’t bother to buy a ticket. This technology could conceivably stop that.
There are serious concerns, though. It’s not hard to imagine situations where such technology would be used on behalf of the dark side. Blocking the bootlegging of copyrighted music or video is one thing. Blocking phones from recording a protest is another. And it’s not hard to imagine police departments having mobile infrared devices to stop people from recording encounters with citizens. That’s just in the United States. Putin would probably put one on every street corner in Russia.
The second issue, of course, is safety. The same device that blocks us from live streaming that Led Zeppelin tribute band would also block concert goers from sending photos and video to police should a catastrophe or terrorist attack happen. And what about apps that use the camera, like barcode scanners or translators?
Finally, and I suspect Apple knows this deep inside their little hearts, blocking the camera would be a sure way to get droves of people to buy Droids. In order for this technology to work, it would have to be universal. The only way to make it universal would be to pass a law requiring all cell phones to have the technology.
Some of these issues could be solved with legislation and/or court cases, in the ongoing march of technology and free speech.
It’s an intriguing idea, one that probably pleases copyright owners from Lin-Manuel Miranda on Broadway to Taylor Swift playing the Hollywood Bowl. Protecting your work at the outset makes sense instead of playing whack a mole after the fact, but we’ll see if it sees the light of day or languishes at the PTO with Apple’s other red headed stepchild patents.
Read more, including Forbes raising the issue of securing secret places from spies with this technology.
Photo: Manel Torralba/Flickr Creative Commons